![]() That 2016 13-in is not enough computer to do what you describe, and because of the slim battery-capable design, asking it to drive Big Displays will make it hot and the fans will scream. There is also no guarantee that Apple wired it up so that the display generator for the built-in can be repurposed to drive an external display - that would take more circuitry that may not be present. Since the built-in is only 2560 by 1600 (and likely NOT billion colors), you are unlikely to get much bandwidth back by disabling it. It appears to have three display generators total, so it can support the built-in plus two displays at resolutions up to 4096x2304 at 60 Hz at over a billion colors.īut it does not have memory bandwidth to support more than the built-in and ONE external display at 5120x2880 at 60 Hz at over a billion colors. By Roman Loyola Senior Editor, Macworld 10:30 pm PDT. See the 13-inch MacBook Pro Product Environmental Report. The 13-inch MacBook Pro is designed with the following features to reduce its environmental impact: 5. The 13-in 2016 uses the Intel Iris Graphics 550 graphics built into the processor. New 1,799 laptop features a tenth-generation Intel Core i5 processor, faster memory, and new graphics. 2.3GHz quad-core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 4.1GHz, with 8MB shared 元 cache 32GB of 3733MHz LPDDR4X memory 1TB, 2TB, or 4TB SSD MacBook Pro and the Environment. Looked around various posts, and did not yet find a definitive answer.Īrticles that refer to the original 13-In MacBook Pro Retina 2012, which used a completely different graphics chip, are NOT applicable to this discussion. I've read that: "Some people have connected more than the recommended number of displays successfully, although this usually results in a significant hit to performance." ( Source)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |